I think that it’s partially both parties responsibility to be held accountable for content that is generated. The ai platforms and social networks where these images may be shared should have sufficient safety protocols in place to remove harmful content and punish users that post it. However, there should also be discourse and punishment outside of these platforms should the content be directly harmful to another individual. Nonetheless, I think platforms taking responsibility first is important as leaving it up to users to self police unfortunately won’t work.
I stand with the point that users should be held primarily responsible for ensuring that the content they generate on AI platforms, including image generation systems, meets appropriate ethical and moral standards. When using AI tools that can create synthetic content from user inputs, it is the user providing the inputs and prompts that shape what gets generated by the system. AI agents themselves cannot be directly blamed for objectionable content if they simply produce outputs based on the requests and guidance given by human users.
I agree with holding individuals responsible because most of the cases we have seen or covered, the misconduct is due to the user rather than the software. Most of the softwares are made for other integral/ethical purposes and then tampered with by individuals.
My stand is with the argument that my team in holding the individuals responsible. Most platforms already have a proper terms and conditions applied that could be use to regulate the content that the user’s generate. However, constant monitoring of any content produced are still difficult. Similarly, identifying a deep fake type of generated content are highly difficult. However, after identifying one, tracking the user’s personal detail could be done even with today’s technology. Due to that reason i believe, holding the user’s accountable are a viable option with the capability of today’s technology.
In the future, I expect that every element could be held accountable in order to avoid any form of misconduct that potentially could lead to any form of harassment.
I believe both users and platforms can be held liable for mature AI content generated, depending on the situation. Nevertheless, it is hard to imagine a situation where platforms are the only one liable because at the end of the day, users are the ones that can actively damage others. Hence, it can be argued that in most cases, the individual could be responsible in a greater part than the platform.
I think that individuals should be held accountable. The source of the input and the intention behind that should be considered, and that boils down to the individual. In addition, platforms should monitor and design the AI in a way that misuse is minimized. However, this will not be enough when misuse and crimes happen, when it becomes absolutely necessary to hold the individual accountable.
This is such a great contemporary topic to discuss. Both platforms and individuals benefit from successful ai generated content and both would take accountability when things go wrong. It gets complicated when we go into the intricacies of how legal or moral it is to create mature contents that are not the social norm or downright illegal (e.g pedophiles making ai child exploiting content.. still ew tho). it is both difficult to prosecute the individual creating such content and spreading them on the dark web as is and even more to hold the platforms that inadvertently help the distribution because they have the ability to delete incriminating evidence? And the power to hire the best legal teams? (Did Facebook ever take full responsibility for the terrorist propaganda thingy?)
I believe that both platforms and individuals should both be held accountable. Platforms should ensure that their technologies are not used in illegal manners, while individuals should be held responsible for generating certain content. At the very least, platforms should have measures to punish individuals and alert local authorities, while individuals should have ways of reporting platforms that may be operating in an illegal manner.
I believe that the two parties share the responsibility if the platform is intended to generate mature content or if the platform is aware of what can be used by individuals and it can set the necessary laws and conditions to prevent misuse, but in situations that the main purpose of the platform wasn’t to generate mature content and there is laws and conditions to avoid this type of content, but users have misused it. Here, individuals are the ones who must be held responsible for the generated content.
I believe that rather than judging solely on a binary, both individuals and platforms should be held responsible for the creation and distribution of illegal content. In my opinion, it should be a platform’s responsibility to have preventative and putative measures against such materials, as well as to remove such materials when they arise and continuously update their software to defend against such content. At the same time, however, if individuals themselves break established laws, I do think that they should also be persecuted for their actions.
I strongly believe that both sides should be hold accountable, however most of these cases have to be analyzed through case by case basis. Platform without question have to play bigger parts on continuously improving both preventive and penalty measures. While “inappropriate” content creations can be easily addressed to its individual creator, the immediate screening and circulation of said contents depends almost entirely on platforms ability to oversight and mitigate.
This time, I stand for both sides, thinking that platforms should be held accountable given the responsibility they have to not increase the risk of harmful behaviours, and should be used solely for the good they can bring to society; while individuals are completely responsible for their behaviour and decisions, and shouldn’t have the opportunity to hide behind a platform. The mix of one being the initiator, and the other being the conduit, highlights how responsibilities should be mindfully distributed among both parties.
Surely platforms have to take responsibility for harmful content and take steps accordingly when users break the use of conduct. Yet we have to be careful to shift solely the burden on the platform, for it signals to a user that they have the liberty to post what they want. If the consequence is a ban – then I’d expect some bad actors not to care and do so anyways (what if they just make new accounts?). Likewise, not holding users accountable beyond a platform signals they may find other ways or platforms that can enable them. Of course, platforms need to take an active stance, but I am just wondering whether it is enough to really stop the spread of mal-content.
I agree with both sides that platform and individual should be held accountable for generating illegal or disturbing material. If we were to only prosecute individuals, the platforms would still be able to provide a space for other individuals wanting to create similar things. Holding platforms responsible would cast a wider net in keeping online content safe. Equally, if only platforms were responsible, it would allow individuals to jump from platform to platform creating and disseminating inappropriate material without ever being held accountable.
I think that it is difficult to only hold one side accountable; both the platform and the individuals using the platform should be held responsible for the distribution of mature content, whether illegal or not. However, I believe it is up to the platforms to incorporate preventative measures and to remove materials that go against platform policy. They also should hold users accountable when they misuse the platform, since in the end, individuals are the ones choosing to use the platform to create harmful content. Nonetheless, the distribution of legal responsibility that is placed on the platform and the individual depends on the specific situation and needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
I think accountability would need to be ensured from both platform & individuals. This holds true now when we are able to distinguish between whats AI generated content and whats not, ensuring platforms have some kind of accountability ensures that it doesnt become too easy for creating mature content for any user and used in an easily avoidable way thats detrimental to others; similarly enforcing individual accountability ensures individuals are prevented from platform hopping to create or consume content in search of platform that are lenient. This would be even more true when we are at a point where its impossible to distinguish from AI generated vs real content.
I think both AI companies and individuals should be held accountable for generating mature content. while absolute freedom in generating contents might be problematic (because sensitivity to mature contents is different from person to person) but at the same time too much monitoring, controlling over generated contents won’t be a solution for the problem.
AI companies should consider the possibility of increasing harmful generated contents and provide regulation, moderation mechanisms and boundaries to prevent acts like harassment or safety-threatening acts and when individuals do not comply with the regulations there should be punishment or consequences.
I think that as of now, both individuals and platforms have responsibility regarding the generation of mature content. I think that although the individual holds the majority of the responsibility for actually creating the content, I think that the platforms also have a large responsibility for content management, whether it is the management of the content used for generation, or the types of content the platform allows users to create. The platforms have a partial responsibility of creating boundaries and precautions for the users to prevent any harmful content generated, and the individuals also must take responsibility of the content they decide to create.
I am in agreement that maintaining social order on the Internet requires accountability from both the platform and the individual. It is crucial for both parties to acknowledge their roles in fostering a safe and respectful online environment. This entails platforms implementing effective security measures, including robust content monitoring, swift action against violations, and adherence to community guidelines. Simultaneously, individuals must recognize their responsibility and conduct themselves responsibly. Enhancing the security system through policy adjustments and clear regulations can significantly contribute to more effective protection of everyone’s interests. By establishing comprehensive guidelines and standards and ensuring their consistent enforcement, we can collectively strive towards cultivating a better and more responsible online community.
I believe that both individuals and platforms should be held responsible for the generation of mature content. Platforms should have a responsibility to take down harmful content and take action against users that do not follow their terms of service. However, it is also important that individuals are held accountable for their actions. By holding both platforms and individuals accountable, I believe we can encourage more ethical use of AI programs.
I’m agreeing that an individual should be held accountable and responsibility when they are creating harmful and generating AI mature contents which are illegal…For as simple as individuals who are aware on sharing and creating the content must be controlled and responsible for what they did. An AI is just only a tool to generated but the person who creates the prompt and their intentions are back to the individual.
I believe users should be held accountable for generating/seeking for such content. At the end of the day, AI itself is a tool that does not have an emotional, nor ethic awareness to the content that they were tasked to generate. Most platforms were made for other purposes, and users are training the algorithm to generate something illegal instead. While platforms should also consider strengthening the rules and making it harder to generate such content easily, it is still up to the users to not use it with malicious intent, hence users should be held accountable.
I think platforms should be held responsible for the generating of NSFW contents. As what we concern more about is the case that the generated content has challenged the law and morality. At this time, there may be no victims as the resources being used is collected legally and does not harm anyone. However, this kind of content may cause harmful effect or risky behavior in the society and the community (like in the paedophiles example). In this scenario, the platforms has the duty to make sure the content is innocent. Besides, most of these content are created to make profit (either for platforms or for individuals), the platforms should be held accountable as a more fundmental stakeholder.
「4」への 23 件のコメント
I think that it’s partially both parties responsibility to be held accountable for content that is generated. The ai platforms and social networks where these images may be shared should have sufficient safety protocols in place to remove harmful content and punish users that post it. However, there should also be discourse and punishment outside of these platforms should the content be directly harmful to another individual. Nonetheless, I think platforms taking responsibility first is important as leaving it up to users to self police unfortunately won’t work.
I stand with the point that users should be held primarily responsible for ensuring that the content they generate on AI platforms, including image generation systems, meets appropriate ethical and moral standards. When using AI tools that can create synthetic content from user inputs, it is the user providing the inputs and prompts that shape what gets generated by the system. AI agents themselves cannot be directly blamed for objectionable content if they simply produce outputs based on the requests and guidance given by human users.
I agree with holding individuals responsible because most of the cases we have seen or covered, the misconduct is due to the user rather than the software. Most of the softwares are made for other integral/ethical purposes and then tampered with by individuals.
My stand is with the argument that my team in holding the individuals responsible. Most platforms already have a proper terms and conditions applied that could be use to regulate the content that the user’s generate. However, constant monitoring of any content produced are still difficult. Similarly, identifying a deep fake type of generated content are highly difficult. However, after identifying one, tracking the user’s personal detail could be done even with today’s technology. Due to that reason i believe, holding the user’s accountable are a viable option with the capability of today’s technology.
In the future, I expect that every element could be held accountable in order to avoid any form of misconduct that potentially could lead to any form of harassment.
I believe both users and platforms can be held liable for mature AI content generated, depending on the situation. Nevertheless, it is hard to imagine a situation where platforms are the only one liable because at the end of the day, users are the ones that can actively damage others. Hence, it can be argued that in most cases, the individual could be responsible in a greater part than the platform.
I think that individuals should be held accountable. The source of the input and the intention behind that should be considered, and that boils down to the individual. In addition, platforms should monitor and design the AI in a way that misuse is minimized. However, this will not be enough when misuse and crimes happen, when it becomes absolutely necessary to hold the individual accountable.
This is such a great contemporary topic to discuss. Both platforms and individuals benefit from successful ai generated content and both would take accountability when things go wrong. It gets complicated when we go into the intricacies of how legal or moral it is to create mature contents that are not the social norm or downright illegal (e.g pedophiles making ai child exploiting content.. still ew tho). it is both difficult to prosecute the individual creating such content and spreading them on the dark web as is and even more to hold the platforms that inadvertently help the distribution because they have the ability to delete incriminating evidence? And the power to hire the best legal teams? (Did Facebook ever take full responsibility for the terrorist propaganda thingy?)
I believe that both platforms and individuals should both be held accountable. Platforms should ensure that their technologies are not used in illegal manners, while individuals should be held responsible for generating certain content. At the very least, platforms should have measures to punish individuals and alert local authorities, while individuals should have ways of reporting platforms that may be operating in an illegal manner.
I believe that the two parties share the responsibility if the platform is intended to generate mature content or if the platform is aware of what can be used by individuals and it can set the necessary laws and conditions to prevent misuse, but in situations that the main purpose of the platform wasn’t to generate mature content and there is laws and conditions to avoid this type of content, but users have misused it. Here, individuals are the ones who must be held responsible for the generated content.
I believe that rather than judging solely on a binary, both individuals and platforms should be held responsible for the creation and distribution of illegal content. In my opinion, it should be a platform’s responsibility to have preventative and putative measures against such materials, as well as to remove such materials when they arise and continuously update their software to defend against such content. At the same time, however, if individuals themselves break established laws, I do think that they should also be persecuted for their actions.
I strongly believe that both sides should be hold accountable, however most of these cases have to be analyzed through case by case basis. Platform without question have to play bigger parts on continuously improving both preventive and penalty measures. While “inappropriate” content creations can be easily addressed to its individual creator, the immediate screening and circulation of said contents depends almost entirely on platforms ability to oversight and mitigate.
This time, I stand for both sides, thinking that platforms should be held accountable given the responsibility they have to not increase the risk of harmful behaviours, and should be used solely for the good they can bring to society; while individuals are completely responsible for their behaviour and decisions, and shouldn’t have the opportunity to hide behind a platform. The mix of one being the initiator, and the other being the conduit, highlights how responsibilities should be mindfully distributed among both parties.
Surely platforms have to take responsibility for harmful content and take steps accordingly when users break the use of conduct. Yet we have to be careful to shift solely the burden on the platform, for it signals to a user that they have the liberty to post what they want. If the consequence is a ban – then I’d expect some bad actors not to care and do so anyways (what if they just make new accounts?). Likewise, not holding users accountable beyond a platform signals they may find other ways or platforms that can enable them. Of course, platforms need to take an active stance, but I am just wondering whether it is enough to really stop the spread of mal-content.
I agree with both sides that platform and individual should be held accountable for generating illegal or disturbing material. If we were to only prosecute individuals, the platforms would still be able to provide a space for other individuals wanting to create similar things. Holding platforms responsible would cast a wider net in keeping online content safe. Equally, if only platforms were responsible, it would allow individuals to jump from platform to platform creating and disseminating inappropriate material without ever being held accountable.
I think that it is difficult to only hold one side accountable; both the platform and the individuals using the platform should be held responsible for the distribution of mature content, whether illegal or not. However, I believe it is up to the platforms to incorporate preventative measures and to remove materials that go against platform policy. They also should hold users accountable when they misuse the platform, since in the end, individuals are the ones choosing to use the platform to create harmful content. Nonetheless, the distribution of legal responsibility that is placed on the platform and the individual depends on the specific situation and needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
I think accountability would need to be ensured from both platform & individuals. This holds true now when we are able to distinguish between whats AI generated content and whats not, ensuring platforms have some kind of accountability ensures that it doesnt become too easy for creating mature content for any user and used in an easily avoidable way thats detrimental to others; similarly enforcing individual accountability ensures individuals are prevented from platform hopping to create or consume content in search of platform that are lenient. This would be even more true when we are at a point where its impossible to distinguish from AI generated vs real content.
I think both AI companies and individuals should be held accountable for generating mature content. while absolute freedom in generating contents might be problematic (because sensitivity to mature contents is different from person to person) but at the same time too much monitoring, controlling over generated contents won’t be a solution for the problem.
AI companies should consider the possibility of increasing harmful generated contents and provide regulation, moderation mechanisms and boundaries to prevent acts like harassment or safety-threatening acts and when individuals do not comply with the regulations there should be punishment or consequences.
I think that as of now, both individuals and platforms have responsibility regarding the generation of mature content. I think that although the individual holds the majority of the responsibility for actually creating the content, I think that the platforms also have a large responsibility for content management, whether it is the management of the content used for generation, or the types of content the platform allows users to create. The platforms have a partial responsibility of creating boundaries and precautions for the users to prevent any harmful content generated, and the individuals also must take responsibility of the content they decide to create.
I am in agreement that maintaining social order on the Internet requires accountability from both the platform and the individual. It is crucial for both parties to acknowledge their roles in fostering a safe and respectful online environment. This entails platforms implementing effective security measures, including robust content monitoring, swift action against violations, and adherence to community guidelines. Simultaneously, individuals must recognize their responsibility and conduct themselves responsibly. Enhancing the security system through policy adjustments and clear regulations can significantly contribute to more effective protection of everyone’s interests. By establishing comprehensive guidelines and standards and ensuring their consistent enforcement, we can collectively strive towards cultivating a better and more responsible online community.
I believe that both individuals and platforms should be held responsible for the generation of mature content. Platforms should have a responsibility to take down harmful content and take action against users that do not follow their terms of service. However, it is also important that individuals are held accountable for their actions. By holding both platforms and individuals accountable, I believe we can encourage more ethical use of AI programs.
I’m agreeing that an individual should be held accountable and responsibility when they are creating harmful and generating AI mature contents which are illegal…For as simple as individuals who are aware on sharing and creating the content must be controlled and responsible for what they did. An AI is just only a tool to generated but the person who creates the prompt and their intentions are back to the individual.
I believe users should be held accountable for generating/seeking for such content. At the end of the day, AI itself is a tool that does not have an emotional, nor ethic awareness to the content that they were tasked to generate. Most platforms were made for other purposes, and users are training the algorithm to generate something illegal instead. While platforms should also consider strengthening the rules and making it harder to generate such content easily, it is still up to the users to not use it with malicious intent, hence users should be held accountable.
I think platforms should be held responsible for the generating of NSFW contents. As what we concern more about is the case that the generated content has challenged the law and morality. At this time, there may be no victims as the resources being used is collected legally and does not harm anyone. However, this kind of content may cause harmful effect or risky behavior in the society and the community (like in the paedophiles example). In this scenario, the platforms has the duty to make sure the content is innocent. Besides, most of these content are created to make profit (either for platforms or for individuals), the platforms should be held accountable as a more fundmental stakeholder.